Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
a 500-word response that includes the following points:
- Discuss the positives, negatives, and lessons learned from the New Zealand collaborative governance study (500 words).
- Reflect on whether such collaboration is or is not possible in your public sector life experiences and/or a public sector case with which you are familiar.
- Be sure to support your statements with appropriate references to this week’s readings and other sources.
- Apply correct APA citations and format to your paper
This slide set contains information needed for the Assignment.
Moloney, K. (2018l). Attached
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008).
Getting the Right Mix: Unpacking Integration Meanings and Strategies.
International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33.
Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007).
Collaborative Governance Case Studies: The Land and Water Forum.
Working Paper No.13/05, New Zealand: Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
Eppel, E. (2013).
Answer preview
Altogether, a valuable lesson that an individual can learn about collaborative governance is the importance of understanding the integrative framework in this arrangement. As such, comprehending the system context, collaborative actions, and collaborative dynamics, which include principle entanglement joint action abilities and shared motivation, is relevant. With that, collaborative governance would be possible in a public sector case like the Land and Water Forum (Eppel, 2013). As seen in the case, stakeholders needed to identify strategic ways of improving the environment; however, this could not have been achieved without collaboration, cooperation, and coordination. According to Keast, Brown, and Mandell (2007), these three factors are necessary for decision-making processes that include external stakeholders. Such considerations influence the development of workable solutions based on the issues raised.
[592 Words]