Strategic Change versus Tactical Change
Select one of the following approaches to understanding or implementing organizational change:
- Dunphy and Stace’s Four Levels of Change
- Balogun and Hailey’s Change Model
- Proactive vs. Reactive Changes
- Strategic Change versus Tactical Change
- Tichy’s 3 Types of Change
- Balanced Scorecard
- Contingency Alignment Framework
- The Stakeholder Approach
Summarize this approach and provide an example of how this information could be useful to an organization. Your initial post should be at least 200 words in length. Support your claims with examples from scholarly resources, and properly cite any references in APA format.
Requirements: 200 words
Answer preview
A good example explaining the two changes is when a hotel executive realizes that the number of Americans who want to travel with their pets has augmented. The hotel company executive will develop a plan to ensure that the hotel will reserve rooms in many hotels located in different places. This initiative will provide reasonable accommodation rooms for travelers with their pets. The hotel executive will advertise such accommodation even before any approach from the customers. This kind of approach is a proactive one since it has been made to cater to customer demand. A reactive approach is only if the hotel executive awaits by not initiating any change unless various hotel managers receive complaints from their guests concerning accommodation for their pets. The proactive approach usually wins the customer’s interest earlier, thus creating more opportunities for the organization.
[287 Words]
Strategic Change versus Tactical Change
