This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.CriteriaExemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Criterion Score

Potential Impact: Legal, Safety, Environmental, and Financial Risks

22.5 points

Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims

20.25 points

Identifies legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks

15.75 points

Identifies legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks, but claims are not logical

0 points

Does not identify legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks

Score of Potential Impact: Legal, Safety, Environmental, and Financial Risks,/ 22.5

Influence of Society, Culture, Politics, Health, Safety and Security

22.5 points

Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims

20.25 points

Describes the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security

15.75 points

Describes the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security, but claims are not logical

0 points

Does not describe the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security

Score of Influence of Society, Culture, Politics, Health, Safety and Security,/ 22.5

Employment Laws: Identification

22.5 points

Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims

20.25 points

Identifies applicable federal laws and acts

15.75 points

Identifies federal laws and acts, but claims are not logical

0 points

Does not identify applicable federal laws and acts

Score of Employment Laws: Identification,/ 22.5

Global Market: Business Challenges When Identifying Risk

22.5 points

Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims

20.25 points

Describes challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting

15.75 points

Describes challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting, but claims are not logical

0 points

Does not describe challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting

Score of Global Market: Business Challenges When Identifying Risk,/ 22.5

Articulation of Response

10 points

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format

9 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

7 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

Score of Articulation of Response,/ 10

Rubric Total ScoreTotalScore of OL 645 Risk Management Plan Project Rubric – Phase I,/ 100Criterion score has been overridden

---

Overall Score

Overall Score

Exemplary86 points minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Proficient56 points minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Needs Improvement1 point minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Not Evident0 points minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Answer preview

Collectivist culture prioritizes group cohesion rather than personal pursuits, while individualist culture encourages personal freedom and independence. Another attribute studied by Muratbekova-Touron (2011) was the femininity dimension. This attribute looks at whether a particular culture embraces feminine attributes within the working environment, especially when it comes to leadership approaches. Muratbekova-Touron (2011) also looked at high and low-context communication. Low context communication cultures are characterized by a transparent communication process, while in high context communication cultures, access to information is restricted, communication is personal, subtle, and situational. Furthermore, ambiguity and non-directness are encouraged within the workplace. The final attribute studied by Muratbekova-Touron (2011) was the language dimension. This attribute looks at how people speak to one another within a particular culture.

[1302 Words]