Teaching Philosophy
You will revisit and revise your teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1. As part of this assignment, you should evaluate your original philosophy and include a one-page discussion of how your thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed and developed during this course. Guidelines for revising your teaching philosophy and the one-page discussion are below.
Assignment Guidelines
Revised Personal Teaching Philosophy (3–5 pages)
- Reflect on the teaching principles and practices discussed during the course.
- What did you learn about teaching that you did not know prior to this course?
- What stood out as important to you over the past 8 weeks?
- Consider how you might expand, adapt, or change your original philosophy to your current perspective on teaching (or you may feel compelled to take it in a completely new direction).
- Your revised teaching philosophy should:
- Have a clear focus or theme.
- Be authentic and personal.
- Relay who you are (or aspire to be) as a teacher.
- Exhibit genuine enthusiasm for teaching.
- Clearly express your current teaching values and beliefs, and discuss why you hold those values and beliefs (whether or not they have changed).
- Describe your current teaching goals (whether or not they have changed).
- Explain the teaching methods or strategies that you believe are best (whether or not they are different from your original philosophy). Note: make sure the teaching methods you find best are consistent with your goals.
- Incorporate any new ideas and/or practices that encourage a rich teaching and learning experience.
- Be 3–5 pages, including the evaluation discussion but excluding title and reference pages; length should suit the context. It should be typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
- Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.
- Follow APA style.
- Have no any grammatical, typographical, or spelling errors.
Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy (1 page)
As part of this revised teaching philosophy assignment, you should include a discussion evaluating how your personal thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed during this course.
- After you have revised your personal teaching philosophy, carefully review your original teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1 of this course.
- Compare your original philosophy to your revised teaching philosophy and evaluate the following in a one-page written discussion:
- Have your teaching goals, methods, or strategies changed, and if so, how and why? Have your teaching priorities and/or perspectives changed or shifted, and if so, how and why?
- Do you value different learning experiences, and if so, what are they and why?
- Include any additional information that may highlight how your thoughts and ideas have changed or developed during this course.
- Include references that you found helpful, insightful, or meaningful in the development of your philosophy of teaching.
- In addition to the course texts, include at least two outside sources from peer-reviewed journals to support your idea
- Your evaluation discussion should:
- Be one page excluding title and reference pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
- Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.
- Follow APA styles
I will upload my part 1 personal philosophy to help.
Requirements: 4-6 pages
Answer preview
The theory recommends breaking down complex classroom instructional information, designing clear instructions, as well as offering scaffolding to mitigate extraneous load and improve learning (Paas & van Merriënboer, 2020).
Besides the lessons I integrated into my teaching philosophy, this course also taught me the value of experiential learning. The practice focuses on providing hands-on experiences, real-world application, and reflection during classroom instruction (Cohen & Henry, 2019). As such, I can integrate this into my teaching to improve student’s learning outcomes and success in their future personal and professional lives (Cohen & Henry, 2019).
[484 Words]