In the discussion preparation, you were asked to use critical thinking and metacognition and analyze the three basic categories of tort law: negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability. You were also asked to identify the four elements necessary to show that the plaintiff presented a prima facie case of negligence. In this discussion, present your analysis by using applicable legal precedents.
Tort law is a civil violation of a person’s rights by another person. These violations may include emotional, economic, physical, reputational injuries, invasion of one’s privacy, and interference with one’s property. Tort law facilitates compensation for incurred damages and discourages other people from repeating the same offense. This paper discusses the distinction between negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability. Although their elements are different, the process of litigating them is the same.(714words)
Need assignment help for this question?
If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!
Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality