I need someone to do a case study by using FIRAC style. That is related to construction law class

Answer preview

Here it is a concern of determining if the offeror or the bidder is found to be non-responsible. In other words, the purchasing officer must be satisfied that the bidder is responsible before they award a contract.  Here the requirement for bidder responsibility if mandatory for the offeror but would be optional for the purchasing officer. Also, the stated procedural irregularities stated by BC& L lack an administrative foundation since the petitioners were not entitled to a hearing. Indeed, the petitioner fails to prove definite property or liberty interests to prevail on the need for a due process in the district court’s prior decisions.

[391 Words]