Read the following case study and present your analysis of the study using this weeks references. Please make sure your initial post is at least 450 words in length not including learning references. Please use two learning resources from this weeks reading.
Study – tells the story of Wendell Johnson, or more specifically, Mary Tudor’s study of children in an orphanage in Iowa. It’s called the Monster Study for a reason as you will see.
Associated Press. (2003, August 6). ‘Monster Study’ still stings. CBS. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/
Main post: After reading the the case study, analyze according to the questions below.
a. Relying on the week’s learning resources, develop an analysis to present as your main post to this discussion form.
b. Give background information and explain which of the General Principles and/or which of the Ethical Standards was violated in the study. Explain how you came to this conclusion, sharing why you believe it was violated.
c. Do you think that the study you chose would be approved by an IRB today? Why do you think the study was allowed, or tolerated, at the time?
d. Post your analysis to the class. Include relevant in-text citation and references when used.
Requirements: 450 words
IRB today would not approve the research as it goes against human rights and the well-being of the participants. It is also unethical and does not meet the standards of IRB. Using participants without their consent and minors for research and experiments is unethical and goes against the well-being of the individuals ( Morrow and Alderson, 2020). The research was tolerated during that time as individuals from marginalized groups were considered less than other people in society. In addition, there were no ethical values, standards, and regulations during this period that regulated what was wrong and what was right.