Law enforcement officers

Initial Post: Post one major response to each discussion board by Wednesday 11:59 pm CT. Initial post must be at least 150 words.

Use APA formatting to reference sources. If there are questions about how to format according to APA you should access: OWL Purdue (Links to an external site.).

See Assignments and Grading for the guidelines for Unit Discussions.

Commenting to Dr. White’s responses are not included in the participation standards – only those to colleagues and do not restate the question as everyone is responding to the same one.

Key Points

Probable Cause, search and seizure, arrest warrants, Fourth Amendment, citizen vs. government agent, justification, components of probable cause.

Objective: Discuss when Fourth Amendment provisions apply to activities undertaken by law enforcement officers, and describe existing rules governing the conduct of searches and seizures.

Police officers experience different types and levels of training which is to prepare them for being able to make decisions concerning predictable situations. One such setting is annual updates on changes in the law. The assumption is, however, that they knew the original law prior to the change. The predictable sets of facts if repeated are easy to deal with. The issue then becomes what to do if the factual scenario is not exactly that for which they were trained.
The legal constraints on police deal with what they should not do in a given set of facts. For example, they must know when, and for what reason a person should be taken into custody or arrested for an offense. The constraints are the basis for most police academy legal training. There are certain official behaviors that must be adhered to in moment of stress. Police constraints protect the liberty of citizens which is the most important freedom. Training is that means of ensuring that police know what they can or cannot do. Is there a professional obligation to be conversant all aspects of the law that they are obligated to enforce?

The two websites for this discussion.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaWgg9rUNz0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylJK4LKAINs

 

This Unit’s Question (do not restate the question because everyone is responding to the same one)

Describe the relationship of probable cause to a citizen’s right to privacy. What would be an example of a violation of privacy and are there sufficient constraints on police power to prevent privacy violations?

Answer preview

The fourth amendment states that a police search should happen when it is a government’s action, and consideration should be made to determine whether the people’s privacy expectation is infringed.  Law enforcers must have adequate reasons to show that a person they have put under arrest has committed a crime.  A lack of justification in police arrest is considered a violation of the fourth amendment. However, conducting searches that violate people’s privacy can be justified under a probable cause. A probable cause refers to a situation where a law enforcer has trustworthy information that exceeds mere suspicion of criminal activity (Worrall & Schmalleger, 2018).

[331 Words]

Law enforcement officers

Global Perspectives

The class that this is for is: Global Perspectives

it needs to be a 5 paragraph argumentative essay (introduction, point 1, point 2, point 3 and the conclusion). 800-1300 word

The essay has to mention Ruth Bader Ginsburg (the supreme court judge that died) at least in the introduction, it has to mention her ideologies and the how different they are from trumps.

The essay question is “Should Donald Trump elect the next supreme court justice?” I am against Donald Trump electing the next Supreme Court justice.

The 3 main points have to always go back to the thesis (which would be that, Donald Trump should not be allowed to elect the next Supreme Court justice)

One of the 3 main points against Donald Trump electing the next Supreme Court justice can be that, Obama wasn’t allowed to do it as it was his last year as president, so it should be the same with trump

I would like the essay to have some quotes, facts and to sound formal. I am a senior in high school, I want a quality piece but it doesn’t have to be university level.

https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-do-us-supreme-court…

https://www.supremecourt.gov/

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/09…

https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/authori….

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2018/brett-k…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh_Supr… (some source I was given, I don’t know how well they will help)

 

it has to be plagiarism free!
Answer preview
Moreover, selecting a Supreme Court judge requires adequate time for the process to be thorough by going through all the nominees. However, the hasty measures of filling the position before the presidential elections will not give enough time to identify a legitimate candidate. According to Paccone (n.d), this is a serious position “with a great deal of power, pay, prestige, and near-perfect job security,” being the top federal court in America. The president should be cautious about selecting a successor within a short window frame. Paccone (n.d) reveals that the nomination process is critical because it requires all stakeholders in the Senate to evaluate the nominated candidate’s competency. Starting with the first process, the president has to pick out a candidate with high intellectual qualities to serve. Even though the constitution does not provide specifications on age, gender, profession, born citizenship, or level of education requirements needed, the selected candidate should have the ability to serve with due diligence. In most cases, a president chooses an individual with a similar political stand.
[1013 Words]

Global Perspectives

Video Games and Violent Behavior

This assignment is designed to help you review APA writing guidelines and to begin finding references for the Critical Thinking Paper that is due in Topic 3.

undefinedIn Topic 3 you will be given 2 topics to choose from: Right to Die or Video Games and Violent Behavior. Two articles for each topic will be given that support each side of the controversy and you are expected to use both articles. Using the Course Materials resources find similar, empirical articles to support your rationale for the Topic 3 paper.

undefinedUse the resources found to construct an APA title page and reference section that conform to guidelines found in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Reference sections should include at least two articles, one e-book, and one electronic source.

undefinedThis assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

undefinedPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

here is the articles need for Topic Right to Die paper

Right to Die

Calabrò, R. S., Naro, A., De Luca, R., Russo, M., Caccamo, L., Manuli, A., … Bramanti, P. (2016). The right to die in chronic disorders of consciousness: Can we avoid the slippery slope argument? Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 13(11–12), 12–24. Retrieved from
https://search-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-02583-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Answer preview
 In the contrary, some medical professionals feel that E&PAS is unethical, and physicians should refrain from participating in it. Rutledge et al. (2019) argue that physicians have a primary responsibility to preserve life and not eliminate it. Therefore, they ought to be more inclined to life-sustaining measures like palliative care, which seeks to make the patients comfortable before they die. Additionally, Rutledge et al. (2019) strongly believe that E&PAS devalues the patient. When physicians induce death, they show that the patient’s life is no longer of value to this world and are better off dead. This view point is a contraction of a human being’s
[493 Words]

Video Games and Violent Behavior

Child Labor Education Project

2. Child Labor laws have shifted dramatically in our country. Children used to be producers in the family and have now become consumers. What do you think is an appropriate age for a child to be allowed to start working? If you believe that children can work, do you think that there should be limitations on the type of jobs that they are able to have? What do you think about different labor and educational laws for migrant children? Describe the labor laws you would want to see in effect.

Resources for Assessment:

Answer preview

Although children can work, I believe that there should be limitations on the types of jobs they can perform. It is because some jobs require someone to make complex decisions, and children’s minds have not developed enough to make such decisions. Also, some jobs like loading and unloading goods from the trucks required a lot of energy, which might deteriorate children’s health. Besides, the laws related to labor and education of migrant children have existed for many years in the United States. For instance, the fair labor standards laws (FLSA) became functional to prohibit any form of discrimination against immigrant and local children (dol.gov).  Also, the Action on Child Arrival policy allows immigrant children to receive citizenship and the same treatment as local children. These laws are benefiting immigrant children, and I would like to see the FLSA laws implemented in order to give immigrant children a chance for education and employment.

[283 Words]

Child Labor Education Project

 

 

Female In Law Enforcement In The US

Please read The Below First

I’m looking for someone who does not use Chegg or Course Hero or any online cites to provide your answers. The professor checks these other sites as well. If you do this to provide your answers and don’t use your own, let me know immediately so I can choose someone else to assist me. I have been notified that an assignment was linked to Chegg or Course Hero etc.

Someone that uses their own words, so nothing can be found on the internet.

Someone who does not Plagiarize others work from online websites.

I have word documents attached with the instructions.

Then let me know.

Thank you.

Subjects are:

Criminal Justice

Text book for this class is Worrall, J., and Schmalleger, F. (2018). Policing. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN 139780134441924

Your answers will be original?

The professor or anyone will not be able find these answers on any online website?

Please answer:

  1. Read all the instructions and let me know if you have any questions about what must be done.
  2. Your answers will be all original?
  3. Do you guarantee that all your work is original and none of what you write can or will be found on any online site?

Therefore, I try to provide a longer time for the work to be completed.

I will check the book and see if they have anything about Women in Law Enforcement

Here’s the two pages that I found in the book (Pictures attached). Also attached a sample.

Refernece

Worrall, J., and Schmalleger, F. (2018). Policing. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

This is what I told the professor for my approval and a list of the References for this assignment. Hope I’m not flooding you with to much info, just trying to make it easier

I would like to do Women in Law Enforcement for my Core Assessment Topic. I choose this topic, because I think that women play an important role in law enforcement even though they make up a short percentage of law enforcement personnel. One of the reason’s that they play an important role, is their ability to deal with conflicts differently than men. Here are my six sources that I will be using for my Core Assessment. I retrieved 3 of the sources from the school library, two from the web and the last one is the text book for the class. Looking forward to your feedback on my topic and hoping to get this topic approved.

Answer preview

According to Worral & Schmalleger (2018), women are still underrepresented in law enforcement agencies across. The underrepresentation is attributed to the perceptions of enforcement agencies that they require people who are aggressive, stable emotionally, and physically fit, attributes that were predominantly associated with men. The early females in police departments mainly did social work. Worral & Schmalleger (2018) says that after hiring one female officer in Portland, other police departments in the area hired women who primarily worked in managing juvenile delinquency. Yu (2018) says that women joined federal enforcement agencies after President Newtown signed an executive order that prohibited discrimination when hiring employees based on race and gender.

[1288 Words]

Female In Law Enforcement In The US

Child abuse and neglect

It is important for counselors to be knowledgeable about laws specific to their state. Go to the Child Welfare Information Gateway, housed by U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

  1. Select your state of practice. NEW YORK
  2. Select at least three topics. DEFINITIONS OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, PARENTAL SUBSTANCE USE AS CHILD ABUSE, DETERMINING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.
  3. Click on the check boxes that relate to your counseling work within the three areas of child abuse and neglect, child welfare, and adoption.
  4. Click the “go” button to begin your search for your state’s statutes.
  5. You will be provided with the specific citations and legal reference to those areas that you identified. Also, you should note that PDF files are available that correspond to these specific areas and that provide information so you can better understand the issue across the states.

Respond to the following:

  • Which topics did you choose and why?
  • What did you learn about the laws in your state related to the topics you chose?
  • How will this knowledge influence your work as a counselor?

    requirements:
    Paper should be substantive, well-developed, and reflective of critical thinking and graduate-level writing. At least 2 scholarly source should be referenced. Paper should be a minimum of 700 words consisting of 2 – 3 well-formed paragraphs. APA guidelines should be followed.

Requirements: 700words min

Answer preview

The gathered knowledge from the New York state law on child welfare is sound in counselor decision making. The strategies and interventions that I will employ in my profession must be consistent with these laws. When faced with child issues, the ultimate priority in decision-making is to promote the child’s best interests (Zell, 2016). it extends to freeing the child from their biological parents for adoption if a nurturing relationship is non-existent. Also, if I suspect abuse of drugs and alcohol that may affect a child’s mental, emotional and physical health, it is appropriate to gather evidence in this state before reporting.

[823 Words]

Child abuse and neglect

Non-profit civil rights organization

Please read the instructions carefully

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 6, 7
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Introduction
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts.” (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2)

We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section “An Expert on Hate in America” in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical thinking.

His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione’s invitation to you, the reader:

Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione’s endorsement and support of the Center’s work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124).

The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016. Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder, 2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as “hate groups” (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).

Self-Assessment Question
Before you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:

  • Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?

Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming opinions.

Your post must answer this question:

  • How do you define the term “expert”?

Your post must also discuss at least two (2) of the following questions:

  • How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.
  • How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?
  • How would you evaluate Dr. Facione’s claim “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124). Does the SPLC fit your definition of “expert”? Be specific in your answer.

Writing Requirements

 

  • Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Requirements: A well thought out discussion answer that talks about all points of the discussion.

Answer preview

It is essential to incorporate facts in forming opinions as they positively affect credibility and reliability. Fact-based statements are based on research findings and proven experience (Chaturvedi, Cambria, Welsch & Herrera, 2018). As a result, they are significantly more reliable than assumptions and thereby useful in opinion shaping. Judgments are subjective observations making them vulnerable to opinions and biases. But, facts provide a solid foundation that facilitates sound judgment. Facts remove the vulnerabilities of personal biases, opposite points of view, mistakes, personal experience to free the decision-maker’s mind for sound judgment (Chaturvedi et al., 2018). Facts also provide information that can be proven by research making them more suitable for judgment as opposed to opinions that are easily refutable. In conclusion, research on facts, opinions, credibility, and reliability is useful in selecting the right information when making judgments.

[541 Words]

Non-profit civil rights organization

Andrea Yate Case

Question Description: Overview: This activity will allow you to examine the roles and responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process, while utilizing a tool that is helpful to
administrators—a graphic organizer.
Prompt: Visit the Shapiro Library and choose an article about the Andrea Yates case. Create a graphic organizer that evaluates this case from arrest to trial,
identifying the different responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process. Include an examination of how the process works and self corrects when
necessary through appeals and retrial. This Inspiration Software guide will help you understand more about graphic organizers.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Responsibilities: Evaluate the Andrea Yates case from arrest to trial, identifying the different responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process.
II. Examination: Include an examination of how the process works and self corrects when necessary through appeals and retrial.

Guidelines for Submission: Consider a free online
Answer preview
https://prezi.com/view/gwmkz5EHJS4W00IOMm5i/
[8 Words]

Andrea Yate Case

International Arbitration organization

I’ll provide a full outline for the research and I just need someone to fill it up and do it

Requirements:

I’ll provide u with an outline

Can you change a bit or paraphrase the hook and conclusion ?

 

I hope you found the outline helpful

And can you please mention some examples? maybe any International Arbitration organization in islamic countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran …..

Answer preview

The fact that they have to interact with a global customer base means they have to deal with different customers with different cultures. A person’s culture has an impact on how they conduct their business, an aspect that might explain the existence of different business etiquettes in different countries. Courtesy of globalization, organizations in countries that embrace sharia law can now easily interact and transact with organizations from the rest of the world where sharia law is not the main form of governance. In the current global corporate era, a business can take a person from their home country to another nation, thanks to the existing or new opportunities they can explore in these new areas. Conducting business in these new environments means that a person has to take cognizance of the fact that they might be doing things differently, considering their different cultural beliefs, practices, and values.

[1650 Words]

International Arbitration organization

Traditional structure of an essay

Format MLA-double spaced. 5 to six pages with detailed outline. The essay must include 5 appropriate Academic researches about the topic.

You must include

  1. an arguable (debatable) claim (thesis)
  2. evidence (reasons) to support your claim (body)
    1. The amount of evidence you need is the amount that best supports your argument.
      1. Many of you are used to the idea of THREE reasons to support your thesis, with one body paragraph of each reason. I want to encourage you to think differently about that for this essay. Instead, I want you to focus on the evidence that is the strongest and most relevant support for your thesis, whether it is two reasons or five. The same idea applies to the number of paragraphs for your evidence. One reason might need two or three paragraphs. One may be perfectly fine. Focus on what you have to say and not the traditional structure of an essay.
  3. A reflective conclusion intended to convince readers your argument is strong. It should not contain a simple restating of your thesis. It should consider the implications of your claim. What happens if your claim isn’t acted on? What are some possible ways your claim can be acted on? (conclusion)

You may also include in your essay:

  • Background/history of the topic
  • A relevant story that demonstrates the importance of the topic or shows why the issue is a problem
  • How you became aware of the issue

Requirements:   |   .doc file

Hello. Please find below the essay about the Abortion that can help you and you can use one of its source for this essay two. It is just defination of the issue but this time I need an arguable essay about Abortion. Please make sure to avoid plagiarism.

Answer preview

The primary argument in favor of legalizing abortion appertains to individual liberties that a person has (Ziegler 11). Civilized societies are defined by their capacity to guarantee personal freedoms and let individuals conduct their affairs without undue interference. Liberty commences with the recognition that an individual has control over their own body and that no one should force them to do or not do something. Proponents of this view assert that the decision to carry a pregnancy to full term or terminate it is best determined by the woman who has the pregnancy. Therefore, forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy and give birth when she does not want to amounts to the derogation of her dignity. Another angle to this argument asserts that pregnancy is tied to a woman’s productive health. Therefore, society should perceive it as a privacy issue that the woman involved is best placed to handle (Ziegler 128). Failure to respect women’s choice on this issue robs them of their dignity and forces them to seek degrading and dangerous alternatives.

[1609 Words]

Traditional structure of an essay